Abstracts by keywords: socio-political relevance
The statements of the thesis paper author group between April 2020 and June 2022 covered three levels: the infection epidemiological situation as a basis, the modern, multimodal prevention concepts as an option for action and the societal level as a context that must be taken into account. Numerous other groups and individuals have set comparable priorities, but overall the reversal of central professional standards in health care with regard to infection management could not be prevented, nor could the use of inadequate prevention concepts and the narrowing of social discourse, the incitement of critical opinions and the revival of “governance” .
05.06.2023
The 7th ad hoc statement from the theses paper author group deals with the topic of the changed STIKO recommendation of May 25th on vaccination in children. Surprisingly, on May 24th, the Standing Vaccination Commission (STIKO) spoke out in favor of the (single) vaccination of healthy children aged 5 to 11 years with an mRNA vaccine, preferably with “Comirnaty”. However, the studies on which the changed recommendation is based only refer to adults; the scientific justification does not provide any evidence for this age group. Consequently, the STIKO also states that the recommendation is being made as a precautionary measure because a renewed increase in SARS-CoV-2 infections is to be expected next autumn. It remains unclear whether a new variant will emerge at all (probable) and whether the vaccine based on the wild type will help against it (questionable). As of: June 23, 2022, 6:00 p.m
22.07.2022
Nationally and internationally, mathematical models of the infection process in the corona pandemic have had an enormous political impact. However, the model-heavy nature of the political decision-making processes has also been widely criticized. From both a technical and a sociological perspective, criticism of maneuvers appears to be necessary due to numerous indications. The extent to which the performance of government-related epidemic modeling in particular has met the challenges should be critically questioned and evaluated in wider circles. Model uncertainties and the complexity of the problem of the spread of infectious diseases should be given greater attention. There needs to be a deeper awareness that mathematical models cannot replace practical medical experience and classical concepts for controlling complex systems.
29.11.2021
The thesis paper author group presents its 4th ad hoc statement with twelve concrete demands that should be initiated on the new health minister's first working day. The group of authors is speaking out at a time when the new appointment at the top of the Federal Ministry of Health makes a new beginning seem possible. As of November 28, 2021, 6:00 p.m
29.11.2021
Bei diesem Text handelt es sich um die Kurzfassung, des Thesenpapiers 8.0, das die Autorengruppe (siehe MVF Online First) erarbeitet hat (Datum 29.8.2021), das zu folgenden Aspekten Stellung nimmt:1. Es wird ein Konzept für das Verständnis der Epidemie entwickelt (Kap. 2 „Pandemie als Komplexes System“), mit dem das schwer zu entschlüsselnde Verhalten der Epidemie zu erklären ist, und das es erlaubt, Empfehlungen für die Steuerung (Messparameter) und die Präventionsstrategie abzuleiten;2. Es wird ein Indikatoren-Set entwickelt (Kap. 3), das die Melderate („Inzidenz“) ablösen kann und über eine erheblich bessere Aussagekraft verfügt;3. Es werden in einem umfangreichen, kritischen Ansatz das Wissen zur SARS-CoV2-Epidemie im Kindes- und Jugendalter dargestellt (Kap. 4) und weitgehende Erleichterungen für diese bisher am stärksten psychosozial belastete Bevölkerungsgruppe gefordert;4. Es wird eine Politische Theorie der Pandemie vorgestellt, die die „Massivreaktion“ der gesellschaftlichen und politischen Ebenen erklärt und für die Diskussion der Handlungsoptionen öffnet.Die Autorengruppe beschäftigt sich seit März 2020 ehrenamtlich mit der Corona-Thematik und greift kontinuierlich mit Thesenpapieren und Ad-hoc-Stellungnahmen in die politische Diskussion ein.
22.09.2021
The group of authors supplements the statements from theses 4 and 6.1 with a third ad hoc statement on intensive care. In correction of the version from May 16, 2021, in Chap. 4 the numbers of patients treated in intensive care are based on the daily value, the hospitalization/intensive care ratio is corrected to the length of stay of 10 days (Table 3) and a footnote (No. 30) is added which deals with the possible explanation for the decrease in the total intensive care bed capacity by outsourcing the pediatric intensive care beds. As of: May 16, 2021, 12:00 p.m., update from May 17, 2021