Abstracts by keywords: meta analysis
There are now some results reports and transfer resolutions that reveal a fundamental problem with the existing transfer regime: methodological problems and the sometimes very specific project design limit the generalizability of the results (BT-Drs. 20/1361, p. 152 ff.). As a result, it is often not possible to make sound transfer recommendations. Since more projects are continually ending and the current federal government also plans in its coalition agreement to perpetuate the innovation fund and specify a more binding path for the project transfer into standard provision (SPD; Alliance90/The Greens; FDP 2021, p. 86 f.), one Development of relevant solutions is essential. After first looking at the problem in more detail below, this article proposes a solution based on common scientific procedures: bringing together findings from related projects through systematic reviews as an extraordinary and permanent thematic focus. Furthermore, this would also take up the suggestion identified in the Prognos report to “[…] synthesize and jointly evaluate the results within selected subject areas in order to create further evidence for certain innovative forms of care (e.g. pilotage projects) on this basis to disseminate implementation-relevant knowledge” (BT-Drs. 20/1361, p. 208).