Abstracts by key term: Diagnosis related groups (DRG)
The aim of the study was to analyze DRG-attributable effects on the care process in and around the hospital. On the basis of 30 representatively selected hospitals in Lower Saxony and using a differentiated methodology, it was possible to show: 1. The quality of direct patient care in the hospital has largely not changed due to the introduction of the DRG. 2. There is no evidence for a targeted selection of lucrative treatment cases. 3. The phenomenon of a "bloody dismissal" cannot be proven. 4. An increase in unplanned readmissions ("revolving door effect") in the course of the introduction of the DRG cannot be proven. 5. The hospitals have created the essential prerequisites for the operational implementation of the DRG system; a future-oriented strategic alignment and a consistent process design has only been partially implemented. 6. The working conditions have changed in the course of the introduction of the DRG, with the documentation and coding effort being overestimated. 7. The medium-sized and large hospitals are largely economically successful even under DRG conditions because they can use the opportunities for strategic realignment, while this is much more difficult for the smaller hospitals.