Zum Inhalt springen
Sponsorship
Die MVF-Knowledge-HubsFrisch aus der Forschung. Täglich aktualisiert!

Suchen Sie in Hunderten nationaler und internationaler Datenbanken nach dem neuesten Studienwissen der angegebenen Themengebiete und/oder lassen Sie sich werktäglich per Newsletter informieren. Die Newsfeeds werden auf deutsch übersetzt and nach Übertragbarkeit auf das deutsche Gesundheits-/Versorgungssystem ausgewählt:

Zu den Knowledge-Hubs

Discourse about the dark side of pricing

At the 4th discussion forum "Market Access & Health Economics" organized by Thieme Verlag - in media cooperation with the MVF sister medium "MA&HP" - a number of speakers offered documentation of what the AMNOG process represents in real terms - which, however, comes from the presented very differently from each perspective. A highlight was the lectures by Josef Hecken, the impartial chairman of the G-BA, and Dr. Antje Haas, head of the medicines and remedies department of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds, the lectures by Prof. Dr. Dieter Cassel, Emeritus for Economic Policy, Health Economist and Representative for International Programs at the Mercator School of Management at the University of Duisburg-Essen, and Dr. jur. Manfred Zipperer, the impartial chairman of the arbitration board according to Section 130 b Paragraph 5 SGB V. The latter both asked “Monitor Healthcare Research” for a joint interview, as all sorts of points had to be discussed in their presentations.

Read more
First publication date: 28.05.2013

Additional Information

Plain Text

> Dear Prof. Cassel, what question would you have liked to ask Mr. Zipperer after your lecture?
Cassel: Mr. Zipperer has made it clear that he is happy with his
Arbitration board sees itself as a mediator and this intention is expressed in its arbitration awards. When I look at my figures, you can see that the arbitration awards regarding the reimbursement amounts are very close to the ideas of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds, but not to those of the pharmaceutical industry. Mr. Zipperer, how can you explain that? Or: Is this your understanding of a mediator?
Zipperer: You have to distinguish between two things here. On the one hand: If the drug has no additional benefit, I am bound to an upper limit. This means nothing other than that the arbitration board has no leeway when it comes to the price. Since a whole range of medicines have no additional benefit, this point plays a not insignificant role.

This is certainly the case with medicines that are recognized
Additional benefits different.
Zipperer: Exactly. What matters here is the value, rank and weight that the Federal Joint Committee has given the additional benefit. Of course, “significant” has a completely different meaning than “minor.”

Can you illustrate this with a real case?
Zipperer: I take the Sativex case with a slight additional benefit: this was where the arbitration board was located
Decision very close to the price expectations of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds. The statements made by the patient representative who was consulted also played an important role. We were so impressed by his comments that we were of the opinion that we had to monetarily increase or improve the weight of the additional benefit, which we cannot change in its classification.

How is it that the most diverse prices, as Prof. Cassel has also shown, are so often far below the average price of the European price basket? One could assume that this price level should represent the lower floor.
Zipperer: I'm already aware of that. Well

 

...

Do you want to leave us already?

Subscribe to our newsletter quickly. Then you can be sure that you won't miss anything.